This column is twaddle. National Review hosts a wide variety of conservative thought in its pages, including social conservatives like George Weigel and Kathryn Jean Lopez, who helped found the National Organization for Marriage. (That's heterosexual marriage, to avoid any further distortions) Mark Steyn broke with National Review over defense strategy in the lawsuit filed by notorious global warming hockey stick fraudster Michael Mann, not over social conservatism. As for William F Buckley, he was such a "social conservative" that he championed marijuana legalization. To read a real conservative position on marijuana, read "Going to Pot" by William Bennett.
Furthering conservative principles is not aided by ill-informed writers like Deace slandering other conservatives like National Review.
Sunday, May 24, 2015
Wednesday, May 13, 2015
In today's America
I've been thinking about life in 2015 America:
Thanks to Lois Lerner and John Koskinen, I no longer instantly delete those emails that say "I'm thinking about f___ing you". I check to make sure they're not from the IRS first.
Seeing Bill Clinton lying with his characteristic shamelessness about Peter Schweitzer, author of the eye-opening (I hope) expose of the Clinton Crime Family Foundation "Clinton Cash", I experienced a wave of nauseastalgia - that sick feeling you get when you remember experiences you wish had never happened to begin with. Damn it, why can't the Clintons take their ill-gotten millions AND GO AWAY??
Thanks to Lois Lerner and John Koskinen, I no longer instantly delete those emails that say "I'm thinking about f___ing you". I check to make sure they're not from the IRS first.
Seeing Bill Clinton lying with his characteristic shamelessness about Peter Schweitzer, author of the eye-opening (I hope) expose of the Clinton Crime Family Foundation "Clinton Cash", I experienced a wave of nauseastalgia - that sick feeling you get when you remember experiences you wish had never happened to begin with. Damn it, why can't the Clintons take their ill-gotten millions AND GO AWAY??
Sunday, May 10, 2015
Test week for liberals, etc.
I wake today to the news that two more police officers (AKA the people who make civilization possible, as Charles Barkley pointed out) have been murdered by thugs, this time in Mississippi. This poses a test for President Obama and new Attorney General Loretta Lynch:
Can B.O. come right out and say this is wrong, murder is never justified, and STOP KILLING THE POLICE? This time, can he avoid the usual boilerplate about "the problems of the black community" and "distrust of the police"? He needs to stop condemning the police before the police start resigning because they feel that the authorities who should be on their side are on the other.
As for the new AG, can Lynch come right out and say that this incident is a horrific crime against those we depend on to keep us safe from criminals? Can she call for the prosecution of the perpetrators to the fullest extent of the law? Can she rise to the dream of Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. and judge the perpetrators "not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character"?
Peter Schweitzer's new book "Clinton Cash" has caused quite a furor and reminded us of the rampant, fantastic corruption of the Clinton Crime Syndicate. I wish these people would just go away and leave us alone, but obviously that's not going to happen. Anyway, Bill Clinton, aka the sleaziest liar in the history of American politics, made a television appearance that was disgraceful even by his sleazy standards. As Charles Krauthammer mentioned on FoxNews Special Report, every word was false. Every word. Many of the lies he told are verifiable, meaning they are lies about facts which can be proven positively.
The challenge is to the so-called mainstream media - can they label the lies as lies this time? The whole reason Billy Jeff Horndog doesn't even bother nodding toward the truth while shoveling his manure is because the media has let him get away with lying (sometimes under oath) for so long. This time, can they behave as truth-seeking journalists and point out the lies? Peter Schweitzer, like any prominent conservative writer, documents his allegation thoroughly. He knows he'll be accused of making things up, so he gives references. Schweitzer is not making things up; the Clintons (don't forget Hilliary's involved, too) are lying, as they have their entire lives.
Will the alphabet-soup media (ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, etc) label the lies of the Clintons this once?
I shouldn't bet the mortgage on it.
Can B.O. come right out and say this is wrong, murder is never justified, and STOP KILLING THE POLICE? This time, can he avoid the usual boilerplate about "the problems of the black community" and "distrust of the police"? He needs to stop condemning the police before the police start resigning because they feel that the authorities who should be on their side are on the other.
As for the new AG, can Lynch come right out and say that this incident is a horrific crime against those we depend on to keep us safe from criminals? Can she call for the prosecution of the perpetrators to the fullest extent of the law? Can she rise to the dream of Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. and judge the perpetrators "not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character"?
Peter Schweitzer's new book "Clinton Cash" has caused quite a furor and reminded us of the rampant, fantastic corruption of the Clinton Crime Syndicate. I wish these people would just go away and leave us alone, but obviously that's not going to happen. Anyway, Bill Clinton, aka the sleaziest liar in the history of American politics, made a television appearance that was disgraceful even by his sleazy standards. As Charles Krauthammer mentioned on FoxNews Special Report, every word was false. Every word. Many of the lies he told are verifiable, meaning they are lies about facts which can be proven positively.
The challenge is to the so-called mainstream media - can they label the lies as lies this time? The whole reason Billy Jeff Horndog doesn't even bother nodding toward the truth while shoveling his manure is because the media has let him get away with lying (sometimes under oath) for so long. This time, can they behave as truth-seeking journalists and point out the lies? Peter Schweitzer, like any prominent conservative writer, documents his allegation thoroughly. He knows he'll be accused of making things up, so he gives references. Schweitzer is not making things up; the Clintons (don't forget Hilliary's involved, too) are lying, as they have their entire lives.
Will the alphabet-soup media (ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, etc) label the lies of the Clintons this once?
I shouldn't bet the mortgage on it.